American political strategist Roger Stone, known for his closeness to former President Donald Trump, issued a warning about what he described as possible intentions by the LIBRE party to manipulate the electoral process in Honduras, sparking debate in diplomatic and political circles.
In statements released in international media and on social networks, Stone asserted that “the Mel Zelaya regime seeks to follow the model of Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela,” warning that Honduran democracy could be affected if transparency in the vote count and the independence of the National Electoral Council (CNE) are not guaranteed.
“The United States must pay attention. Honduras could be the next case in Latin America where a democratic election is transformed into an authoritarian project,” Stone said, urging both the White House and the U.S. Congress to closely monitor the Honduran electoral process.
Diverse responses observed in Honduras
The alert elicited varied reactions. Opposition factions view Stone’s remarks as indicative of international concern about possible electoral fraud, whereas leaders of the LIBRE party characterized the involvement as “foreign interference” driven by political motives.
Diplomatic sources in Washington confirmed that international organizations are closely monitoring the situation in Honduras, expressing concern about growing political tension, questions about the electoral system, and reports of the use of public resources for partisan purposes.
Institutional implications and electoral context
Analysts agree that Stone’s statement increases international scrutiny of the Honduran electoral process, placing the LIBRE party and the current government under the gaze of external observers. This situation coincides with a moment in which the ruling party candidate, Rixi Moncada, faces a decline in the polls, intensifying attention on governance and confidence in electoral institutions.
International oversight joins other voices across the Americas and Europe that have demanded assurances of autonomy, openness, and deference to the public’s wishes, strengthening the belief that electoral bodies are crucial for the nation’s political steadiness.
Political and social scenario
Stone’s call highlights the political polarization that Honduras is experiencing, as well as the importance of maintaining a solid electoral system in the face of possible challenges.
The debate that has arisen shows that citizen participation, supervision by international organizations, and the independence of the CNE are decisive factors for the legitimacy of the process.
With the general elections just weeks away, the situation reflects tensions between parties, international actors, and citizens, in a context where institutional trust and the transparency of the electoral system are key determinants for future governance and political stability.